How to Implement Surgical Remote Monitoring: The Top 3 Workflows for Enrolling & Monitoring Patients
July 15, 2021
In an effort to reduce the surgical backlog caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, many healthcare organizations are seeking innovative technology solutions. An effective Surgical Remote Monitoring platform can lessen the backlog by reducing hospital length of stay, readmissions, ED visits, and by ultimately ensuring patients get the right care outside of the hospital. After assembling an optimal team for your Surgical Remote Monitoring program, it is important to determine how to best engage your staff & patients to maximize the potential of the technology.
“How much time will this take?” is the most common question you will hear from front-line staff. The short answer is “it depends” - depending on your staff resources and goals, the level of staff involvement can vary - and you may evolve this over time.
Below are the 3 main levels of staff engagement you can choose from, each with its own pros and cons. In short, there is typically a correlation between level of staff engagement and patient satisfaction & clinical outcomes. However, there is no “right” or “wrong” approach - ultimately, the appropriate approach is what works best within the resources and clinical workflows of your team. Note: Depending on resources, teams can use different levels for different activities (e.g. Hands on for patient education, engagement and enrolling + Hands Off for monitoring).
This approach builds on the “hands off” framework, by adding:
More staff verbal education to increase patient engagement. Patient usage of the program is reinforced by team members at all phases of care (pre-op, in-hospital and at discharge).
Staff using clinical alerts and remote monitoring dashboards to intervene sooner for patients at-risk. This also allows the care team to view real-time patient-reported outcomes (e.g. symptoms, incision photos) to help make informed decisions such as whether an immediate follow-up visit is necessary.
This high touch approach generally leads to more patient engagement and further reductions in ER visits and readmissions, as providers are able to be more proactive in catching complications earlier.
Workflow #3: Supercharged (Very High Touch):
Patient explanation: 5-7 minutes / patient (brochures, verbal, App demonstration) Patient enrollment: 30-60 seconds / patient Live remote monitoring & follow-up: 15-45 mins / week / care team member (monitoring work is more distributed)
This approach builds on the “hands on” framework, by adding:
More staff promotion and education of the program, such as including a hands-on App demonstration for the patient before enrollment
Using more customized alerts and dashboards for specific care team members - thereby involving the more appropriate team member for different issues flagged by the platform. For example, wound care nurses are alerted for wound issues).
Patient adoption, engagement and ultimately clinical outcomes are highest with this approach.
Check out our podcast episode on “How to Implement Surgical Remote Monitoring” where we discuss the topic in-depth below:
Want a step-by-step plan to help you get started with a Surgical Remote Monitoring program? Download our free whitepaper here for a practical guide on how to get started with a Surgical Remote Monitoring program today.
Recent news from SeamlessMD
September 14, 2021
SeamlessMD Podcast - Episode 48 - Dr Carmine Simone: Pioneering Digital Patient Engagement in Ontario
In this episode of the SeamlessMD Podcast, Dr. Joshua Liu, Co-founder & CEO at SeamlessMD, and marketing colleague, Alan Sardana, chat with Dr. Carmine Simone, thoracic surgeon and Vice President of Clinical Programs at Michael Garron Hospital (MGH), Medical Lead for Covid Response at MGH, Medical Director for Integrated Programs for Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre and MGH, and Associate professor in the Department of Surgery at the University of Toronto. See the full show notes below for details.
UAB presents at 16th Annual Academic Surgical Congress showing 94.7% patient activation with Patient Engagement Technology
UAB recently presented an abstract at the 16th Annual Academic Surgical Congress entitled, “Who chooses not to use Patient Engagement Technology (PET)?” which examines the key factors behind why Colorectal, Cardiac, Thoracic and Gynecology patients may or may not choose to enroll in a PET.
SeamlessMD Podcast - Episode 47 - Using Digital Patient Engagement for Spine Surgery
In this episode of the SeamlessMD Podcast, Dr. Joshua Liu, Co-founder & CEO at SeamlessMD, and marketing colleague, Alan Sardana, chat with Daniella Lock, BHSc, MSc, Patient Education Specialist at SeamlessMD about Using Digital Patient Engagement for Spine Surgery. See the full show notes below for details.